Association between different corticosteroid regimens used in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection and short-term mortality: retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, several corticosteroid regimens have been used in the treatment of the disease, with disparate results according to drug and regimen used. For this reason, we wanted to analyze differences in early mortality derived from the use of different regimens of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in SARS-CoV-2 infection in critically ill patients requiring admission to an ICU. METHOD: Observational, analytical and retrospective study, in an intensive care unit of a third-level university hospital, (March 2020 and June 2021). Adult patients (>18 years old) who were admitted consecutively for proven SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The association with mortality in ICU at 28 days, different corticosteroid regimens used, was analyzed using a Cox proportional risk regression model. RESULTS: Data from a cohort of 539 patients were studied. Patient age (RR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.10; P=<0.01) showed a significant association with 28-day mortality in the ICU. In the comparison of the different corticosteroid regimens analyzed, taking as a reference those patients who did not receive corticosteroid treatment, the dose of dexamethasone of 6mg/day showed a clear trend towards statistical significance as a protector of mortality at 28 days in the ICU (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.15-1.02, p=0.05). The dose of dexamethasone of 6mg/day and low doses of methylprednisolone show a similar association with survival at 28 days (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.63-2.26). CONCLUSIONS: The use of corticosteroids has been associated with better mortality outcomes in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the therapeutic benefits of corticosteroids are not limited to dexamethasone alone.

Transoperative intravitreal dexamethasone implantation in patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the anatomical results in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, at least grade B of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, and with a trans-surgical dexamethasone implant vs the control group. We also assessed the diminution of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and the final visual acuity (VA). METHOD: The patients were evaluated clinically and with optical coherence tomography for 10 months. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of the dexamethasone implant on retinal detachment. Correlational analyses were explored depending on the variables' distribution, and an independent samples t-test was used to compare the VA in both groups. RESULTS: The study included 38 eyes of patients with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: 18 with the implant and 20 for the control group. The evaluation of the main objective showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the anatomical success between the two groups (61.1% vs. 20%, treatment vs. control); odds ratio of 6.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.5- 26.8; p = 0.013; Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.225. The t-test showed a significant difference in the final VA of the patients (t = 2.047; df = 36; p = 0.048; Cohen's d = 0.66). CONCLUSIONS: Retinal redetachment was less frequent, and better VA was observed, in patients with the dexamethasone implant in comparison with the control group.

OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados anatómicos en pacientes con desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno, vitreorretinopatía proliferativa a partir de grado B y aplicación de implante de dexametasona transquirúrgico frente a un grupo control. También se valoraron la disminución de la vitreorretinopatía proliferativa y la agudeza visual (AV) final. MÉTODO: Los pacientes se evaluaron clínicamente y con tomografía de coherencia óptica por 10 meses. Se realizaron análisis de regresión logística para evaluar el efecto del implante en el redesprendimiento de retina. Se exploraron análisis correlacionales dependiendo de la distribución de variables y se aplicó la prueba t de muestras independientes para comparar la AV en ambos grupos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 38 ojos de pacientes con vitreorretinopatía proliferativa: 18 con el implante y 20 del grupo control. La evaluación del objetivo principal mostró diferencias significativas (p < 0.05) en el éxito anatómico entre ambos grupos (61.1% en los ojos con tratamiento frente a 20% en el grupo control); razón de momios de 6.29; intervalo de confianza del 95%: 1.5- 26.8; p = 0.013; R2 de Nagelkerke = 0.225. La prueba t mostró una diferencia significativa entre la AV final de los pacientes (t = 2.047; gl = 36; p = 0.048; d de Cohen = 0.66). CONCLUSIONES: Se observó menor redesprendimiento, así como mejor AV, en los pacientes con el implante de dexametasona en comparación con el grupo control.

Remdesivir plus dexamethasone is associated to improvement in the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients regardless of their vaccination status / Remdesivir más dexametasona se asocian a una reducción de los eventos clínicos en los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19, independientemente de su estado de vacunación

Introduction Remdesivir seems to reduce the risk of hospitalization and improve clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Objectives To compare the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone, according to their vaccination status. Material and methods A retrospective observational study was carried out in 165 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from October 2021 to January 2022. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier and the log-rank tests were used to evaluate the event (need for ventilation or death). Results Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (n=87) compared with dexamethasone alone (n=78) showed similar age (60±16, 47–70 vs. 62±37, 51–74 years) and number of comorbidities: 1 (0–2) versus 1.5 (1–3). Among 73 fully vaccinated patients, 42 (47.1%) were in remdesivir plus dexamethasone and 31 (41%) in dexamethasone alone. Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone needed intensive care less frequently (17.2% vs. 31%; p=0.002), high-flow oxygen (25.3% vs. 50.0%; p=0.002) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (16.1% vs. 47.4%; p<0.001). Furthermore, they had less complications during hospitalization (31.0% vs. 52.6%; p=0.008), need of antibiotics (32.2% vs. 59%; p=0.001) and radiologic worsening (21.8% vs. 44.9%; p=0.005). Treatment with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14–0.48; p<0.001) and vaccination (aHR 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21–0.74) were independent factors associated with lower progression to mechanical ventilation or death. Conclusions Remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone and vaccination independently and synergistically protects hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen therapy from progression to severe disease or dead (AU)

Introducción Remdesivir parece reducir el riesgo de hospitalización y mejorar el resultado clínico en pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19. Objetivos Comparar el desenlace clínico de pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 tratados con remdesivir más dexametasona vs. dexametasona sola, según su estado de vacunación. Material y métodos Se realizó un estudio observacional retrospectivo en 165 pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 desde octubre de 2021 hasta enero de 2022. Se consideró como evento la necesidad de ventilación o muerte. esultados Los pacientes tratados con remdesivir más dexametasona (n=87) en comparación con dexametasona sola (n=78) mostraron una edad similar (60±16, 47-70 vs. 62±37, 51-74 años) y número de comorbilidades: 1 (0-2) vs. 1,5 (1-3). Entre 73 pacientes completamente vacunados, 42 (47,1%) estaban en remdesivir más dexametasona y 31 (41%) en dexametasona sola. Los pacientes tratados con remdesivir más dexametasona necesitaron cuidados intensivos con menos frecuencia (17,2 vs. 31%; p=0,002), oxígeno de alto flujo (25,3 vs. 50%; p=0,002) y ventilación mecánica no invasiva (16,1 vs. 47,4%, p<0,001). Además, tuvieron menos complicaciones durante la hospitalización (31 vs. 52,6%; p=0,008), necesidad de antibióticos (32,2 vs. 59%; p=0,001) y empeoramiento radiológico (21,8 vs. 44,9%; p=0,005). El tratamiento con remdesivir más dexametasona (aHR, 0,26; IC 95% 0,14-0,48; p<0,001) y la vacunación (aHR 0,39; IC 95% 0,21-0,74>) fueron factores independientes asociados con una menor progresión a ventilación mecánica o muerte. Conclusiones Remdesivir en combinación con dexametasona protegieron de forma independiente y sinérgica a los pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 que requieren oxigenoterapia de la progresión a la enfermedad grave o la muerte (AU)

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant as an adjuvant treatment for pediatric patients with Coats' disease / Implante intravítreo de dexametasona como tratamento adjuvante em pacientes pediátricos com doença de Coats

ABSTRACT We report two cases of stage 3A unilateral Coats' disease in pediatric patients. In both cases, disease control was achieved using a dexamethasone intravitreal implant in addition to other treatments. The treatment improved visual acuity in one patient and prevented the worsening of the decline in visual acuity in the other patient during follow-up periods of 7 and 3 years, respectively. One of the patients presented an increase in intraocular pressure, which was controlled with topical antiglaucoma medication, but developed a cataract that required surgery. In conclusion, dexamethasone intravitreal implant may be a useful adjuvant treatment to consider in some pediatric cases with Coats' disease.

RESUMO Relatamos dois casos de doença de Coats em estágio 3A unilateral em pacientes pediátricos. Em ambos os casos, o controle da doença foi obtido com implante intravítreo de dexametasona, além de outros tratamentos, com melhora da acuidade visual em um caso e sem piora da visão no outro, durante um período de acompanhamento de 7 e 3 anos. Um dos casos apresentou elevação da pressão intraocular controlada com medicação antiglaucoma tópica e desenvolveu catarata que exigiu cirurgia. Em conclusão, o implante intravítreo de dexametasona pode ser um tratamento adjuvante útil a ser considerado em alguns casos pediátricos com doença de Coats.

Prospective evaluation of the effectiveness of combined treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone implants / Estudo intervencionista prospectivo para avaliar a eficácia da associação do bevacizumabe intravítreo ao implante de dexametasona para edema macular secundário à oclusão da veia retiniana

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of in­­­travitreal bevacizumab injections following a single dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch and central retinal vein occlusion. Methods: This was a prospective interventional non-comparative study, 44 eyes of patients with naïve macular edema related to branch and central retinal vein occlusion were treated with a dexamethasone implant. Patients were followed-up at four-week intervals from the second to the sixth month. If persistent or recurrent macular edema occurred during this period, the patient was treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections on an as-needed basis. The outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness changes. Results: The mean best-corrected visual acuity changed from 0.97 ± 0.33 LogMAR at baseline to 0.54 ± 0.40 at the six-month post-implant examination (p<0.00001). Improvement ≥3 Snellen lines were seen in 20 eyes (45.54%). The mean central macular thickness at baseline was 670.25 ± 209.9 microns. This had decreased to 317.43 ± 112.68 microns at the six-month follow-up (p<0.00001). The mean number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections received in the six months post-implant was 2.32. The mean time from dexamethasone implant to first anti-VEGF injection was 3.45 months. Conclusions: Intravitreal bevacizumab injections following a single dexamethasone implant were found to improve best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness in patients with macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusion at six months, with few intravitreal injections required.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia da combinação de in­jeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe em olhos com edema macular secundário à oclusão de ramo e da veia central da retina após um único implante de dexametasona. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo intervencionista não comparativo com 44 olhos de pacientes com edema macular relacionado à oclusão de ramo e veia central da retina, sem tratamento prévio e tratados com um único implante de dexametasona, que foram acompanhados em intervalos de quatro semanas do segundo ao sexto mês. Se fosse constatado edema macular persistente ou recorrente durante esse período, os pacientes eram tratados com injeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe em um regime ajustado conforme a necessidade. Foram estudadas a melhor acuidade visual corrigida e alterações da espessura macular central. Resultados: A média da melhor acuidade visual corrigida mudou de 0,97 ± 0,33 LogMAR iniciais para 0,54 ± 0,40 no exame de 6 meses (p<0,00001). Vinte olhos (45,54%) melhoraram 3 linhas de Snellen ou mais. A média da espessura macular central inicial foi de 670,25 ± 209,9 μm e diminuiu para 317,43 ± 112,68 μm na visita de 6 meses (p<0,00001). O número médio de injeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe em 6 meses foi de 2,32 e o tempo médio entre o implante de dexametasona e a primeira injeção de anti-VEGF foi de 3,45 meses. Conclusão: Injeções intravítreas de bevacizumabe após um único implante de dexametasona podem proporcionar um aumento da melhor acuidade visual corrigida e diminuição da espessura macular central aos 6 meses em pacientes com edema macular devido à oclusão de ramo e da veia central da retina, com poucas injeções intravítreas.

Viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation versus Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for silicone oil glaucoma in the pseudophakic eye / Viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior versus implante de válvula de Ahmed para glaucoma por óleo de silicone em olho pseudofácico

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation to Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation for secondary glaucoma following silicone oil removal. Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 43 vitrectomized pseudophakic eyes with persistent glaucoma after silicone oil removal. Patients were randomized to either viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation or Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. All patients were examined on day 1, week 1, and months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 postoperatively. Postoperative complications were noted. Success was defined as an intraocular pressure between 6 and 20 mmHg and with an intraocular pressure reduction of >30% compared with the preoperative intraocular pressure. Results: There were 22 eyes in the viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and 21 eyes in the Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation group. The mean preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure in the viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation groups were 35.5 ± 2.6 mmHg and 35.5 ± 2.4 mmHg and 16.9 ± 0.7 mmHg and 17.9 ± 0.9 mmHg respectively (p˂0.0001). There was a statistically significant intraocular pressure reduction at all follow-up time points compared to preoperative values (p˂0.0001) in both groups. The unqualified success rate in the viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation groups were 72.73% and 61.9%, respectively. A minimal self-limited hyphema was the most common complication. Conclusions: Both viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation and Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation are effective in lowering the intraocular pressure in glaucoma after silicone oil removal with viscotrabeculotomy with anterior chamber irrigation providing greater reduction, higher success rates, and minimal complications.

RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar a viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior com o implante de válvula de glaucoma de Ahmed para glaucoma secundário após remoção de óleo de silicone. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo prospectivo de 43 olhos pseudofácicos vitrectomizados com glaucoma persistente após a remoção de óleo de silicone. Os pacientes foram randomizados para viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior ou implante de válvula de Ahmed. Todos os pacientes foram examinados no primeiro dia, na primeira semana e 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 e 24 meses após a cirurgia. Observaram-se complicações pós-operatórias. O sucesso foi definido como uma pressão intraocular entre 6 e 20 mmHg e uma redução da pressão intraocular >30% em comparação com a pressão intraocular pré-operatória. Resultados: Foram designados 22 olhos para o grupo da viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior e 21 olhos para o grupo do implante de válvula de Ahmed. A pressão intraocular média pré-operatória foi de 35,5 ± 2,6 mmHg para o grupo da viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior e pós- e de 35,5 ± 2,4 mmHg no grupo do implante de válvula de Ahmed. e Os valores pós-ope­ratórios foram de 16,9 ± 0,7 mmHg e 17,9 ± 0,9 mmHg para esses mesmos grupos, respectivamente (p<0,0001). Ambos os grupos tiveram uma redução estatisticamente significativa da pressão intraocular em relação aos valores pré-operatórios (p<0,0001) em todos os momentos do acompanhamento. A taxa de sucesso não qualificado nos grupos da viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior e do implante de válvula de Ahmed foi de 72,73% e 61,9%, respectivamente. A complicação mais comum foi o hifema, autolimitado e mínimo. Conclusões: Tanto a viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação da câmara anterior quanto o implante de válvula de Ahmed são eficazes na redução da pressão intraocular no glaucoma após injeção de óleo de silicone, mas a viscotrabeculotomia com irrigação em câmara anterior proporcionou maior redução da pressão intraocular e maiores taxas de sucesso, com complicações mínimas.

Remdesivir plus dexamethasone is associated to improvement in the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients regardless of their vaccination status.

INTRODUCTION: Remdesivir seems to reduce the risk of hospitalization and improve clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical outcome of COVID-19 hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone alone, according to their vaccination status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out in 165 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from October 2021 to January 2022. Multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank tests were used to evaluate the event (need for ventilation or death). RESULTS: Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (n=87) compared with dexamethasone alone (n=78) showed similar age (60±16, 47-70 vs. 62±37, 51-74 years) and number of comorbidities: 1 (0-2) versus 1.5 (1-3). Among 73 fully vaccinated patients, 42 (47.1%) were in remdesivir plus dexamethasone and 31 (41%) in dexamethasone alone. Patients treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone needed intensive care less frequently (17.2% vs. 31%; p=0.002), high-flow oxygen (25.3% vs. 50.0%; p=0.002) and non-invasive mechanical ventilation (16.1% vs. 47.4%; p<0.001). Furthermore, they had less complications during hospitalization (31.0% vs. 52.6%; p=0.008), need of antibiotics (32.2% vs. 59%; p=0.001) and radiologic worsening (21.8% vs. 44.9%; p=0.005). Treatment with remdesivir plus dexamethasone (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14-0.48; p<0.001) and vaccination (aHR 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.74) were independent factors associated with lower progression to mechanical ventilation or death. CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir in combination with dexamethasone and vaccination independently and synergistically protects hospitalized COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen therapy from progression to severe disease or dead.

Impacto de los corticoides sistémicos en el tiempo de hospitalización en pacientes con COVID-19 / Impact of systemic corticosteroids on length of hospitalization among patients with COVID-19

Objetivo: la COVID-19 supuso una amenaza para la capacidad hospitalaria por el elevado número de ingresos, lo que llevó al desarrollo de diversas estrategias para liberar y crear nuevas camas hospitalarias. Dada la importancia de los corticoides sistémicos en esta enfermedad, se evaluó la eficacia de estos en la reducción de la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (EH) y se comparó el efecto de 3 corticosteroides diferentes sobre este resultado.Métodose realizó un estudio de vida real de diseño tipo cohorte retrospectiva y controlado. Se analizó una base de datos hospitalaria de 3.934 pacientes hospitalizados con diagnóstico de COVID-19 en un hospital terciario entre abril y mayo de 2020. Se comparó un grupo de enfermos que recibieron corticosteroides sistémicos (grupo con corticoides [GC]) frente a un grupo control que no recibió corticosteroides sistémicos (grupo sin corticoides [GSC]) emparejado por edad, sexo y gravedad de la enfermedad mediante una puntuación de propensión. La decisión de prescribir glucocorticoides dependía principalmente del criterio del médico responsable.Resultadosse compararon un total de 199 pacientes hospitalizados en el GC con 199 en el GSC. La EH fue más corta para el GC que para el GSC (mediana=3 [rango intercuartílico=0-10] vs. 5 [2-8,5]; p=0,005, respectivamente), mostrando un 43% más de probabilidad de ser hospitalizado ≤4 días que >4 días cuando se usaron corticosteroides. Además, esta diferencia solo la mostraron aquellos tratados con dexametasona (76,3% hospitalizados ≤4 días vs. 23,7% hospitalizados >4 días [p<0,001]). Los niveles de ferritina sérica, glóbulos blancos y plaquetas fueron más elevados en el GC. No se observaron diferencias en la mortalidad ni en el ingreso a la unidad de cuidados intensivos. (AU)

Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to hospital capacity due to the high number of admissions, which has led to the development of various strategies to release and create new hospital beds. Due to the importance of systemic corticosteroids in this disease, we assessed their efficacy in reducing the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and compared the effect of 3 different corticosteroids on this outcome.MéthodWe conducted a real-world, controlled, retrospective cohort study that analysed data from a hospital database that included 3934 hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital from April to May 2020. Hospitalised patients who received systemic corticosteroids (CG) were compared with a propensity score control group matched by age, sex and severity of disease who did not receive systemic corticosteroids (NCG). The decision to prescribe CG was at the discretion of the primary medical team.ResultsA total of 199 hospitalized patients in the CG were compared with 199 in the NCG. The LOS was shorter for the CG than for the NCG (median=3 [interquartile range=0–10] vs. 5 [2–8.5]; p=0.005, respectively), showing a 43% greater probability of being hospitalised ≤4 days than >4 days when corticosteroids were used. Moreover, this difference was only noticed in those treated with dexamethasone (76.3% hospitalised ≤4 days vs. 23.7% hospitalised >4 days [p<0.001]). Serum ferritin levels, white blood cells and platelet counts were higher in the CG. No differences in mortality or intensive care unit admission were observed.ConclusionsTreatment with systemic corticosteroids is associated with reduced LOS in hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19. This association is significant in those treated with dexamethasone, but no for methylprednisolone and prednisone. (AU)

A slow-release dexamethasone implant for cancer-associated retinopathy / Implante de liberacao lenta de dexametasona para retinopatia associada ao cancer

ABSTRACT This case report aims to show the anatomical and functional results of a patient diagnosed as having cancer-associated retinopathy treated with a controlled-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex). Anatomical outcomes were assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography; and functional outcomes, by measuring visual acuity, microperimetry, and mutifocal electroretinography. The follow-up period was 1 year.

RESUMO Este relato de caso tem como objetivo mostrar os resultados anatômicos e funcionais de um paciente com diagnóstico de retinopatia associada ao câncer tratado com implante de liberação controlada de dexametasona (Ozurdex®). Os resultados anatômicos foram avaliados por SD-OCT e os resultados funcionais por medida de acuidade visual, microperimetria e eletrorretinograma multifocal. O período de acompanhamento foi de um ano.

Impact of systemic corticosteroids on length of hospitalization among patients with COVID-19. / [Artículo traducido] Impacto de los corticoides sistémicos en el tiempo de hospitalización en pacientes con COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to hospital capacity due to the high number of admissions, which has led to the development of various strategies to release and create new hospital beds. Due to the importance of systemic corticosteroids in this disease, we assessed their efficacy in reducing the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and compared the effect of 3 different corticosteroids on this outcome. MéTHOD: We conducted a real-world, controlled, retrospective cohort study that analysed data from a hospital database that included 3934 hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital from April to May 2020. Hospitalised patients who received systemic corticosteroids (CG) were compared with a propensity score control group matched by age, sex and severity of disease who did not receive systemic corticosteroids (NCG). The decision to prescribe CG was at the discretion of the primary medical team. RESULTS: A total of 199 hospitalized patients in the CG were compared with 199 in the NCG. The LOS was shorter for the CG than for the NCG (median=3 [interquartile range=0-10] vs. 5 [2-8.5]; p=0.005, respectively), showing a 43% greater probability of being hospitalised ≤4 days than >4 days when corticosteroids were used. Moreover, this difference was only noticed in those treated with dexamethasone (76.3% hospitalised ≤4 days vs. 23.7% hospitalised >4 days [p<0.001]). Serum ferritin levels, white blood cells and platelet counts were higher in the CG. No differences in mortality or intensive care unit admission were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with systemic corticosteroids is associated with reduced LOS in hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19. This association is significant in those treated with dexamethasone, but no for methylprednisolone and prednisone.

Umbrales auditivos en pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere manejados con corticoides transtimpánicos

Introducción: Pese a que el uso de corticoides transtimpánicos en pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere es habitual en muchos centros, la evidencia respecto de su efecto sobre los umbrales auditivos es aún controversial. Objetivo: Estudiar los umbrales auditivos de pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere que recibieron corticoides transtimpánicos en el Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile. Material y Método: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere que consultaron entre los años 2015 y 2021. Se estudiaron los umbrales auditivos, antes y después de 3 inyecciones de dexametasona transtimpánica. Resultados: Se obtuvieron datos completos de 27 pacientes. Al comparar el promedio tonal puro antes y después del tratamiento, no se observaron diferencias significativas. A nivel individual, la variación de cambio de los umbrales auditivos con dexametasona se correlaciona en forma significativa con los umbrales auditivos previos a las inyecciones y con el tiempo transcurrido desde la última inyección, pero no con la edad. Conclusión: La terapia con dexametasona transtimpánica en pacientes con enfermedad de Méniere no altera los umbrales auditivos. Sin embargo, se requieren más estudios, para comprobar, si existe un efecto transitorio en los umbrales auditivos de los primeros días posterior al procedimiento.

Introduction: Although transtympanic corticosteroids are proposed in Méniere's disease patients refractory to standard medical therapy, the evidence regarding the effect of transtympanic corticosteroids on hearing thresholds is still controversial. Aim: To study the hearing thresholds of patients with Méniere's disease who were administrated with transtympanic corticosteroids at the Otorhinolaryngology Service of the University of Chile's Clinical Hospital. Material and Method: Retrospective study of Méniere's disease patients who consulted between 2015 and 2021. Demographic variables and hearing thresholds were studied before and after three transtympanic injections of dexamethasone. Results: A total of 27 patients were studied. There were non-significant differences in pure-tone hearing threshold averages before and after the injections. Individual variation in hearing thresholds correlates significantly with the pre-injection hearing thresholds and the period since the last injection, but not with age. Conclusion: Transtympanic dexamethasone therapy in patients with Meniere's disease does not alter hearing thresholds. However, more studies are needed to verify whether there is a transitory effect on hearing thresholds in the first days after the procedure.

Impact of systemic corticosteroids on hospital length of stay among patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to hospital capacity due to the high number of admissions, which has led to the development of various strategies to release and create new hospital beds. Due to the importance of systemic corticosteroids in this disease, we assessed their efficacy in reducing the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and compared the effect of 3 different corticosteroids on this outcome. METHODS: We conducted a real-world, controlled, retrospective cohort study that analysed data from a hospital database that included 3934 hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital from April to May 2020. Hospitalised patients who received systemic corticosteroids (CG) were compared with a propensity score control group matched by age, sex and severity of disease who did not receive systemic corticosteroids (NCG). The decision to prescribe CG was at the discretion of the primary medical team. RESULTS: A total of 199 hospitalized patients in the CG were compared with 199 in the NCG. The LOS was shorter for the CG than for the NCG (median = 3 [interquartile range = 0-10] vs. 5 [2-8.5]; p = 0.005, respectively), showing a 43% greater probability of being hospitalised ≤ 4 days than > 4 days when corticosteroids were used. Moreover, this difference was only noticed in those treated with dexamethasone (76.3% hospitalised ≤ 4 days vs. 23.7% hospitalised > 4 days [p < 0.001]). Serum ferritin levels, white blood cells and platelet counts were higher in the CG. No differences in mortality or intensive care unit admission were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with systemic corticosteroids is associated with reduced LOS in hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19. This association is significant in those treated with dexamethasone, but no for methylprednisolone and prednisone.

Dexametasona frente a metilprednisolona ajustada al peso en pacientes con neumonía moderada-grave por SARS-CoV-2 / Dexamethasone versus weight-adjusted methylprednisolone in patients with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia

Objetivos: Comparar el desenlace clínico (mortalidad y/o ingreso en UCI) a 30 días de los pacientes ingresados por neumonía moderada-grave por SARS-CoV-2 tratados con dexametasona tras el estudio RECOVERY frente aquellos tratados con metilprednisolona ajustada al peso.MétodosEstudio de cohortes retrospectivo de 65 pacientes con neumonía moderada-grave que recibieron 6 mg/día de dexametasona (grupo DXM) frente a 80 tratados con metilprednisolona ajustada al peso (grupo MTPN).ResultadosFallecieron 21 (32,3%) pacientes del grupo DXM vs. 8 (10%) del grupo MTPN (valor p < 0,001) y 29 (44,6%) del grupo DXM requirieron ingreso en UCI vs. 2 (2,5%) del grupo MTPN (valor p < 0,001). No hubo diferencias basales respecto a características sociodemográficas con un qSOFA medio superior en el grupo MTPN. La razón de riesgo para la mortalidad y el ingreso en UCI ajustada por edad, sexo y PCR al ingreso fue de 2,189 (1,082-4,426; IC 95%) y 10,589 (2,139-48,347; IC 95%) para el grupo DXM, respectivamente, vs. grupo MTPN.ConclusionesLa mortalidad e ingreso en UCI fue menor en pacientes tratados con metilprednisolona ajustada al peso frente a los tratados con dexametasona. (AU)

Objectives: To compare the 30-day outcome (mortality and/or ICU admission) of patients admitted for moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with dexamethasone after the Recovery study versus those treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of 65 patients with moderate-severe pneumonia who received dexamethasone 6 mg/day (DXM group) versus 80 treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone (MTPN group).ResultsTwenty-one (32.3%) patients in the DXM group died vs. 8 (10%) in the MTPN group (p-value < 0.001) and 29 (44.6%) in the DXM group required ICU admission vs. 2 (2.5%) of the MTPN group (p-value < 0.001). There were no baseline differences regarding sociodemographic characteristics with a higher mean qSOFA in the MTPN group. The hazard ratio for mortality and ICU admission adjusted for age, sex, and admission CRP was 2.189 (1.082–4.426; 95% CI) and 10.589 (2.139–48.347; 95% CI) for the DXM group, respectively, vs. MTPN group.ConclusionsMortality and admission to the ICU were lower in patients treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone compared to those treated with dexamethasone. (AU)

Effects of the epiretinal membrane on the outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion / Os efeitos de uma membrana epirretiniana nos resultados da implantação de dexametasona intravítrea para edema macular secundário à oclusão de ramo da veia retiniana

ABSTRACT Purpose: To investigate the effects of epiretinal membrane formation on the clinical outcomes of intravitreal dexamethasone implantation for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Methods: This retrospective interventional case series includes the treatment of naive patients with macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion who underwent intravitreal dexamethasone implantation. The patients were divided into two groups as follows: Group 1 (n=25), comprised of patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion without epiretinal membrane, and Group 2 (n=16), comprised of patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with an epiretinal membrane. Corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, and central macular volume values were measured before and after treatment. The clinical outcomes of the groups were compared. Results: Mean age and male-to-female ratio were similar between the two groups (p>0.05, for both). The baseline and final corrected visual acuity values, central macular thickness, and central macular volumes of the groups were similar (p>0.05, for all). All the parameters were significantly improved after intravitreal dexamethasone implantation treatment (p<0.001, for all). The changes in central macular thickness and volume were also similar (p>0.05, for both). The mean number of intravitreal dexamethasone implantations was 2.1 ± 1.0 (range, 1-4) in Group 1 and 3.0 ± 1.2 (range, 1-5) in Group 2 (p=0.043). Conclusion: Epiretinal membrane formation had no effects on the baseline and final clinical parameters, including corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness and volume. The only parameter affected by the presence of epiretinal membrane formation is the number of intravitreal dexamethasone implantations, a greater number of which is needed for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with an epiretinal membrane.

RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar os efeitos da formação de uma membrana epirretiniana nos resultados clínicos da implantação intravítrea de dexametasona para edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana. Métodos: Esta série retrospectiva de casos intervencionais inclui o tratamento de indivíduos com edema macular secundário à oclusão não isquêmica de um ramo da veia retiniana, sem tratamento prévio e que foram submetidos a implantação intravítrea de dexametasona. Os indivíduos foram divididos em dois grupos: Grupo 1 (n=25), composto por indivíduos com edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana sem a presença de uma membrana epirretiniana, e Grupo 2 (n=16), composto por indivíduos com edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana com a presença de uma membrana epirretiniana. Os valores da acuidade visual corrigida, espessura macular central e volume macular central foram obtidos antes e após o tratamento. Os resultados clínicos dos grupos foram comparados. Resultados: A média de idade e a proporção entre homens e mulheres foram semelhantes nos dois grupos (p>0,05 para ambos os valores). Os valores iniciais e finais da acuidade visual corrigida, espessura macular central e volume macular central foram semelhantes nos dois grupos (p>0,05 para todos os valores). Todos os parâmetros melhoraram significativamente após o tratamento com implante de dexametasona intravítrea (p<0,001 para todos os parâmetros) e as alterações na espessura macular central e no volume macular central também foram semelhantes (p>0,05 para ambos os valores). O número médio de implantações intravítreas de dexametasona foi 2,1 ± 1,0 (faixa de 1-4) no Grupo 1 e 3,0 ± 1,2 (faixa de 1-5) no Grupo 2 (p=0,043). Conclusão: A formação de uma membrana epirretiniana não tem efeitos sobre os parâmetros clínicos iniciais e finais, incluindo a acuidade visual corrigida, a espessura macular central e o volume macular central. O único parâmetro afetado pela formação de uma membrana epirretiniana é o número de implantações intravítreas de dexametasona, sendo necessário um número maior de implantações em casos de edema macular secundário à oclusão de um ramo da veia retiniana com a presença de uma membrana epirretiniana.

[Dexamethasone versus weight-adjusted methylprednisolone in patients with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia]. / Dexametasona frente a metilprednisolona ajustada al peso en pacientes con neumonía moderada-grave por SARS-CoV-2.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the 30-day outcome (mortality and/or ICU admission) of patients admitted for moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with dexamethasone after the Recovery study versus those treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 65 patients with moderate-severe pneumonia who received dexamethasone 6 mg/day (DXM group) versus 80 treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone (MTPN group). RESULTS: Twenty-one (32.3%) patients in the DXM group died vs. 8 (10%) in the MTPN group (p-value < 0.001) and 29 (44.6%) in the DXM group required ICU admission vs. 2 (2.5%) of the MTPN group (p-value < 0.001). There were no baseline differences regarding sociodemographic characteristics with a higher mean qSOFA in the MTPN group. The hazard ratio for mortality and ICU admission adjusted for age, sex, and admission CRP was 2.189 (1.082-4.426; 95% CI) and 10.589 (2.139-48.347; 95% CI) for the DXM group, respectively, vs. MTPN group. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality and admission to the ICU were lower in patients treated with weight-adjusted methylprednisolone compared to those treated with dexamethasone.

Scleral communication between Glaucoma drainage device capsule and the suprachoroidal space simulating amelanotic choroidal melanoma / Comunicação escleral entre a cápsula de dispositivo de drenagem para glaucoma e o espaço supracoroidal simulando melanoma de coroide amelanótico

ABSTRACT This is a case report involving a 56-year-old male patient with a history of pars plana vitrectomy due to a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the right eye that resulted in the implantation of a drainage device after the patient developed secondary glaucoma. Two years after the device's implantation, the patient was referred to our care as his visual acuity had decreased to 20/200 (1.00 LogMAR). At the fundus evaluation, a choroidal amelanotic elevation was observed at the upper temporal equator, and a potential diagnosis was made of amelanotic choroidal melanoma. The ultrasound exam visualized the patient's implanted superotemporal justabulbar drainage device, which revealed a transscleral communication from the plate fibrocapsular's draining space to the suprachoroidal space (fistula). The ultrasound also revealed a focal pocket of choroidal detachment in the patient's superotemporal region, simulating an amelanotic choroidal melanoma. A new pars plana vitrectomy was performed to remove the internal limiting membrane without repercussions at the fistula site. The patient's recovery progressed well, and he regained a visual acuity of 20/70 (0.55 LogMAR). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of this condition.

RESUMO Relato de caso de paciente 56 anos, sexo masculino, com histórico de vitrectomia via pars plana por descolamento de retina em olho direito e posterior implante de dispositivo de drenagem por glaucoma secundário. Dois anos após o procedimento foi encaminhado ao serviço por baixa de acuidade visual (AV) de 20/200 (1.00 LogMAR). À fundoscopia, observou-se uma elevação amelanótica temporal no equador com hipótese diagnóstica de melanoma de coroide amelanótico. O exame de ultrassom mostrou implante de dispositivo de drenagem justabulbar temporal superior com comunicação transescleral para espaço subcoroidal (fístula), sugerindo bolsão focal de descolamento de coroide em equador temporal superior simulando melanoma de coroide amelanótico. O paciente foi abordado cirurgicamente devido membrana epirretiniana com nova vitrectomia via pars plana para peeling de membrana limitante interna, sem repercussões no local da fístula, evoluindo bem com acuidade visual de 20/70 (0.55 LogMAR). Ao nosso conhecimento, este é o primeiro caso relatado nessa condição.

Corticosteroid safety in COVID-19 patients: a pharmacovigilance study / Seguridad de corticoesteroides en pacientes con COVID-19: un estudio de farmacovigilancia

The use of oral and intravenous corticosteroids as a treatment for SARS-CoV-2 infection has been shown to inhibit the exaggerated inflammatory response, reducing symptoms and days of hospitalization of patients. However, its use is controversial because not enough clinical studies have been made to verify the safety of the drugs. Objective: To assess the safety profile of corticosteroids treatment, at high and low doses, in suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19, determining the most frequent side effects in patients, and assessing whether the administration of the drugs represents a greater benefit than the risk of presenting these effects. Methods: Ambispective study of active pharmacovigilance at a cohort of confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients, treated with intravenous and oral corticosteroids. 366 patients were evaluated and divided into 3 groups: use of methylprednisolone (155 mg average) every 24 hours for 3 days, dexamethasone (6 mg) every 24 hours for 10 days, and a control group. Results: The distribution of the cases with hyperglycemia was 33 in high doses and 82 with low doses of corticosteroids and both high and low doses have a similar distribution in cases of infections. When evaluating the harshness and severity of hyperglycemia in the two groups with corticosteroids, it is observed that patients with high doses present more harsh (48%). In case of harshness and severity of infections it is observed that patients with high doses present more harsh (62%) and more severe (79%) cases than those who were administered low doses. (AU)

El uso de corticoides orales e intravenosos como tratamiento para la infección por SARS-CoV-2 ha demostrado inhibir la respuesta inflamatoria exagerada, reduciendo los síntomas y los días de hospitalización de los pacientes. Sin embargo, su uso es controvertido porque no se han realizado suficientes estudios clínicos para verificar la seguridad de los medicamentos. Objetivo: Evaluar el perfil de seguridad del tratamiento con corticoides, a dosis altas y bajas, en pacientes con sospecha o confirmación de COVID-19, determinando los efectos secundarios más frecuentes en los pacientes, y valorando si la administración de los fármacos representa un mayor beneficio que el riesgo de presentar estos efectos. Métodos: Estudio ambispectivo de farmacovigilancia activa en una cohorte de pacientes confirmados o sospechosos de COVID-19, tratados con corticoides intravenosos y orales. Se evaluaron 366 pacientes y se dividieron en 3 grupos: uso de metilprednisolona (155 mg promedio) cada 24 horas por 3 días, dexametasona (6 mg) cada 24 horas por 10 días y un grupo control. Resultados: La distribución de los casos con hiperglucemia fue de 33 casos usando dosis altas y 82 con dosis bajas de corticoides, tanto las dosis altas como las bajas tienen la misma distribución en los casos de infecciones. Al evaluar la severidad y gravedad de la hiperglucemia en los dos grupos con corticoides, se observa que los pacientes con dosis altas presentan mayor gravedad (48%). En caso de severidad y gravedad de las infecciones se observa que los pacientes con dosis altas presentan casos más graves (62%) y más severos (79%) que los que recibieron dosis bajas. (AU)

Biosensor development in sports doping with dexamethasone / Desenvolvimento de biossensor no doping esportivo com dexametasona / Desarrollo de un biosensor en el doping deportivo con dexametasona

ABSTRACT Introduction: Dexamethasone is a type of drug that is considered a steroid. It belongs to a class of drugs known as corticosteroids. Objective: Develop an electrochemical sensor of dexamethasone in a pharmaceutical sample using electrodes modified with nanostructures of MnO2 and reduced graphene oxide (MnO2/rGO). The glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) used to make the GO nanostructures were first modified using a modified Hummers technique before electrochemically reduced. Methods: MnO2 nanomaterials were electrochemically deposited on rGO/GCE. SEM structural investigation indicated vertical tetragonal crystal development of -MnO2 nanostructures in sprayed rGO nanostructures. Results: Because of the high composite surface area, multiple exposed active sites, and the synergistic effect of MnO2 and rGO, the electrocatalytic reaction to dexamethasone of MnO2/rGO/CPE was shown to be broad, selective, stable, and sensitive in electrochemical tests using amperometry. It was established that the linear range, sensitivities, and detection limit of the sensor are 0 to 260 µM, 4.6153µA/µM and 0.005 µM, respectively. The MnO2/rGO/CPE was tested for accuracy and applicability in determining dexamethasone in pharmacological and human urine samples. Conclusion: The results revealed that the sensor could prepare acceptable recovery (96.34%) and RSD (3.58%), suggesting that it could be used as a reliable dexamethasone sensor in clinical samples. Level of evidence II; Therapeutic studies - Investigation of treatment outcomes.

RESUMO Introdução: A dexametasona é um tipo de medicamento considerado um esteróide. Pertence a uma classe de medicamentos conhecida como corticosteróides. Objetivo: Este estudo teve como objetivo desenvolver um sensor eletroquímico de dexametasona em uma amostra farmacêutica utilizando eletrodos modificados com nanoestruturas de MnO2 e óxido grafeno reduzido (MnO2/rGO). Os eletrodos de carbono vítreo (GCE), que foram utilizados para fazer as nanoestruturas GO, foram primeiramente alterados através de uma técnica Hummers modificada antes de serem reduzidos eletroquimicamente. Métodos: Os nanomateriais de MnO2 foram depositados eletroquimicamente no rGO/GCE. A investigação estrutural do SEM indicou o desenvolvimento vertical do cristal tetragonal de -MnO2 nanoestruturas em nanoestruturas de rGO pulverizadas. Resultados: Em virtude da alta área de superfície composta, dos múltiplos locais ativos expostos e do efeito sinérgico de MnO2 e rGO, a reação eletrocatalítica à dexametasona de MnO2/rGO/CPE mostrou ser ampla, seletiva, estável e sensível nos testes eletroquímicos utilizando a amperometria. Foi estabelecido que o alcance linear, sensibilidades e limite de detecção do sensor são de 0 a 260 µM, 4,6153µA/µM e 0,005 µM, respectivamente. O MnO2/rGO/CPE foi testado para precisão e aplicabilidade na determinação de dexametasona em amostras farmacológicas e de urina humana. Conclusão: Os resultados revelaram que o sensor é capaz de preparar uma recuperação aceitável (96,34%) e RSD (3,58%), sugerindo que ele poderia ser usado como um sensor de dexametasona confiável em amostras clínicas. Nível de evidência II; Estudos terapêuticos - Investigação dos resultados do tratamento.

RESUMEN Introducción: La dexametasona es un tipo de fármaco considerado como un esteroide. Pertenece a una clase de medicamentos conocidos como corticosteroides. Objetivo: Este estudio tiene como objetivo desarrollar un sensor electroquímico de dexametasona en una muestra farmacéutica utilizando electrodos modificados con nanoestructuras de MnO2 y óxido de grafeno reducido (MnO2/rGO). Los electrodos de carbono vítreo (GCE), que se utilizaron para fabricar las nanoestructuras de GO, se modificaron primero mediante una técnica de Hummers modificada antes de ser reducidos electroquímicamente. Métodos: Los nanomateriales de MnO2 se depositaron electroquímicamente sobre rGO/GCE. La investigación estructural por SEM indicó el desarrollo vertical del cristal tetragonal de las nanoestructuras de -MnO2 en las nanoestructuras de rGO pulverizadas. Resultados: En virtud de la elevada área superficial del compuesto, los múltiples sitios activos expuestos y el efecto sinérgico del MnO2 y el rGO, la reacción electrocatalítica a la dexametasona del MnO2/rGO/CPE demostró ser amplia, selectiva, estable y sensible en pruebas electroquímicas mediante amperometría. Se estableció que el rango lineal, las sensibilidades y el límite de detección del sensor son de 0 a 260 µM, 4,6153µA/µM y 0,005 µM, respectivamente. Se probó la precisión y aplicabilidad del MnO2/rGO/CPE en la determinación de dexametasona en muestras farmacológicas y de orina humana. Conclusión: Los resultados revelaron que el sensor es capaz de preparar una recuperación aceptable (96,34%) y una RSD (3,58%), lo que sugiere que podría utilizarse como un sensor fiable de dexametasona en muestras clínicas. Nivel de evidencia II; Estudios terapéuticos - Investigación de los resultados del tratamiento.

Efectividad de la profilaxis antiemética en el posoperatorio de pacientes operados por cirugía de mínimo acceso

Anestesia, náuseas y vómitos postoperatorios van unidas prácticamente desde que la anestesia general se introdujo en la práctica clínica quirúrgica, y todavía en la actualidad sigue presentando una incidencia inaceptablemente alta. Con el objetivo de evaluarla efectividad de la medicación preanestésica antiemética con ondansetrón en comparación con dexametasona, en la prevención de la aparición de náuseas y vómitos postoperatorios, se realizó un estudio prospectivo, cuasiexperimental, con grupo control no equivalente en pacientes operados por cirugía de mínimo acceso en el hospital provincial general "Carlos Manuel de Céspedes″ de Bayamo, entre septiembre 2017 hasta diciembre 2020, distribuidos aleatoriamente en dos grupos de 78 pacientes cada uno: el grupo I tratado con ondansetrón, y el grupo II tratado con dexametasona. Fueron utilizados el test del Xi-cuadrado (X2), y la prueba de diferencias de proporciones, con un valor de p = 0,05; los pacientes entre 40 a 49 años de edad, el sexo femenino, ASA II, sin antecedentes de náuseas y vómitos; y con estratificación de riesgo intermedio de nausea y vómitos, fueron más frecuente en el grupo al que se le administró dexametasona. En el grupo I, el mayor número de pacientes tuvo intensidad leve y un número reducido de pacientes requirieron rescate antiemético con dimenhidrinato. En el grupo II, el mayor número de pacientes reportó intensidad moderada seguida de fuerte, requiriendo rescate antiemético. Se concluyó que la administración de ondansetrón en monoterapia es más efectiva en la prevención de la aparición de náuseas y vómitos postoperatorios que la administración de dexametasona.

Postoperative anaesthesia, nausea and vomiting have been linked practically since general anaesthesia was introduced into clinical surgical practice, and still today it continues to have an unacceptably high incidence. With the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of preanesthetic antiemetic medication with ondansetron compared to dexamethasone, in the prevention of the appearance of postoperative nausea and vomiting, a prospective, quasi-experimental study was carried out with a control group not equivalent in patients operated by minimally accessible surgery in the general provincial hospital "Carlos Manuel de Céspedes" of Bayamo. between September 2017 to December 2020, randomly distributed into two groups of 78 patients each: group I treated with ondansetron, and group II treated with dexamethasone. The Xi-square test (X2) and the proportions differences test were used, with a value of p = 0.05; patients between 40 and 49 years of age, female, ASA II, with no history of nausea and vomiting; and with intermediate risk stratification of nausea and vomiting, were more frequent in the group administered dexamethasone. In group I, the largest number of patients had mild intensity and a small number of patients required antiemetic rescue with dimenhydrinate. In group II, the largest number of patients reported moderate intensity followed by strong intensity, requiring antiemetic rescue. It was concluded that ondansetron monotherapy is more effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting than dexamethasone administration.

Anestesia pós-operatória, náuseas e vômitos têm sido associados praticamente desde que a anestesia geral foi introduzida na prática clínica cirúrgica, e ainda hoje continua a ter uma incidência inaceitavelmente alta. Como objetivo de avaliar a eficácia da medicação antiemética pré-anestésica com ondansetrona comparada à dexametasona na prevenção do aparecimento de náuseas e vômitos pós-operatórios, foi realizado um estudo prospectivo, quase experimental, com um grupo controle não equivalente em pacientes operados por cirurgia minimamente acessível no hospital geral provincial "Carlos Manuel de Céspedes" de Bayamo entre setembro de 2017 a dezembro de 2020, distribuídos aleatoriamente em dois grupos de 78 pacientes cada: grupo I tratado com ondansetron e grupo II tratado com dexametasona. Foram utilizados o teste do xi-quadrado (X2) e o teste de diferenças de proporções, com valor de p = 0,05; pacientes entre 40 e 49 anos, sexo feminino, ASA II, sem história de náuseas e vômitos; e com estratificação de risco intermediário para náuseas e vômitos, foram mais frequentes no grupo que recebeu dexametasona. No grupo I, o maior número de pacientes apresentou intensidade leve e um pequeno número de pacientes necessitou de resgate antiemético com dimenidrinato. No grupo II, o maior número de pacientes relatou intensidade moderada seguida de intensidade forte, necessitando de resgate antiemético. Concluiu-se que a monoterapia com ondansetrona é mais efetiva na prevenção de náuseas e vômitos pós-operatórios do que a administração de dexametasona.

Perfil prescriptivo de corticoides en el servicio de urgencias del Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa, Argentina / Prescriptive Profile of Corticoids in the Emergency Department of the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa, Argentina

Objetivo: identificar el perfil prescriptivo de corticoides en pacientes que asistieron al Servicio de Urgencias del Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa, Argentina. Métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal, observacional y descriptivo, se analizaron las prescripciones de corticoides realizadas por odontólogos que atendieron en el Servicio de Urgencias del Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa desde marzo 2019 a febrero 2020. Las variables de estudio fueron: características demográficas del paciente, diagnóstico clínico odontológico, corticoide prescrito, dosis y forma farmacéutica. Resultados: de un total de 9.635 historias clínicas, se observaron 3.244 prescripciones de corticoides (33,6%). De acuerdo a los corticoides prescritos, se halló a la dexametasona para vía intramuscular y además se utilizó dexametasona en tratamientos combinados con dipirona para vía intramuscular e ibuprofeno para vía oral. Los diagnósticos relacionados con prescripción de estos medicamentos fueron: pulpitis, periodontitis apical aguda, flemón/absceso, entre otras. De acuerdo al valor intrínseco terapéutico potencial, los fármacos prescritos en el hospital odontológico son de valor elevado, esto significa que demostraron eficacia para el tratamiento, el diagnóstico o la prevención de enfermedades del ser humano. Conclusiones: el estudio de la utilización de medicamentos en el Hospital Odontológico de la ciudad de Formosa permitió observar situaciones donde los corticoides no están indicados. Además, se señala la prescripción excesiva de la vía intramuscular. A partir de los resultados obtenidos es necesario realizar una retroalimentación a los prescriptores, por lo que se sugieren intervenciones para elaborar propuestas de solución a los problemas identificados y formular políticas de medicamentos.

Objective: to identify the prescriptive profile of corticosteroids in patients who were treated at the Emergency Service of the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa, Argentina. Methods: a cross-sectional, observational, and descriptive study was carried out, and corticosteroid prescriptions made by dentists who attended the Emergency Service of the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa, from March 2019 to February 2020 were analyzed. The study variables were: demographic characteristics of the patient, dental clinical diagnosis, corticosteroid prescribed, dose, and pharmaceutical form. Results: Of 9,635 medical records, 3,244 corticosteroid prescriptions (33.6%) were observed. According to the prescribed corticosteroids, dexamethasone was found for the intramuscular route, and dexamethasone was also used in combined treatments with dipyrone for the intramuscular route and ibuprofen for the oral route. The diagnoses related to the prescription of these medications were: pulpitis, acute apical periodontitis, phlegmon/abscess, trauma, pericoronitis, hypersensitivity and alveolitis. According to the potential therapeutic intrinsic value, the drugs prescribed in the dental hospital are of high value, which means that they have demonstrated efficacy for the treatment, diagnosis or prevention of diseases that affect humans. Conclusions: the study of the use of drugs in the Dental Hospital of the City of Formosa allowed us to observe situations where corticosteroids are not indicated. In addition, the excessive prescription of the intramuscular route is pointed out. Based on the results obtained, it is necessary to provide feedback to the prescribers, so it is suggested to continue with different interventions to develop proposals for solutions to the identified problems and formulate drug policies.